Akanksha Dileep Nitture vs Sonal Patil Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Jun at 09:12 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Dileep Nitture vs S. Patil

IND
2
Win
Played
0
Win

IND
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nitture 2 - 0 Patil
They have played 4 sets in total, with Akanksha Dileep Nitture winning 4 and Sonal Patil winning 0. The last match between Akanksha Dileep Nitture and Sonal Patil was at the W15 Tashkent, 04-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Akanksha Dileep Nitture getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nitture | 2 |
| Patil | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Tashkent(06-04-25)
(Q2) W35 Gurugram(03-03-25)
A. D. Nitture vs S. Patil H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 45.07% (64-78) | Career Total W/L | 47.89% (34-37) |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. D. Nitture vs S. Patil Match Preview:
- In recent months, Patil has a slightly superior second serve performance, winning 40.18% of points compared to Nitture's 38.77%.
- Nitture excels in returning second serves, claiming 52.42% of points, whereas Patil secures 48.84%.
- Both players show similar strength in first serve returns, with Patil at 35.05% and Nitture at 34.2%.
- Under pressure, Nitture is better at saving breakpoints, achieving a 51.14% save rate, while Patil manages 40.41%.
- Overall match-winning rates show Nitture at 50% over the past year, overtaking Patil's 45.45%.
- Both players perform best on Clay, with Patil having a slight advantage winning 58% of matches against Nitture's 45%.
- Patil's weakest performance is on Hard surfaces (47% win rate), while Nitture struggles on I.hard with no wins.
- Nitture leads in direct head-to-head competition, winning their sole encounter convincingly.
- The players' match durations average at 1:36:35 without entering any deciding sets or tiebreakers.
- Nitture faces opponents with a generally lower average rank than Patil, which could impact their win rate.
- Nitture is more successful in deciding sets, winning 46% compared to Patil's 30% over the past 12 months.
- In break-point conversion, Nitture is marginally ahead, converting 43.35% of opportunities compared to Patil's 40.91%.
Editorial Prediction (June 3, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming tennis match displays contrasting strengths for both players. Patil exhibits marginally better second serve performance, yet Nitture’s ability to capitalize on return games might be critical. Nitture not only edges out in pressure scenarios, saving more breakpoints but also has a stronger break-point conversion rate.
Patil seems more adept on varying surfaces, particularly Clay, while understanding Nitture’s weakness on I.hard makes their competition intriguing, considering they shine under immense game pressure. Their direct confrontation history provides Nitture an upper hand, marking their prior win as a significant psychological advantage.
Factoring recent form, surface suitability, and in-game pressure resilience, Nitture’s consistent strengths suggest they are more likely to secure victory in this encounter.
Akanksha Dileep Nitture vs Sonal Patil Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. D. Nitture vs S. Patil H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 6 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:38:24 | Average Match Time | 1:38:24 |
| 55% (57/103) | 1st Serve % | 50% (58/117) |
| 58% (33/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (33/58) |
| 61% (28/46) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (17/59) |
| 55% (12/22) | Break Pts Won % | 17% (2/12) |
| 57% (67/117) | Return Points Win % | 41% (42/103) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. D. Nitture Recent Matches Played
S. Patil Recent Matches Played

A. D. Nitture vs S. Patil Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 45.07% (64/78) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.89% (34/37) |
| 45.34% (146/176) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.47% (79/84) |
| 47.69% (1414/1551) | Games Win/Loss | 49.48% (760/776) |
| 45.76% (54/64) | Hard Win/Loss | 45.76% (27/32) |
| 45.45% (10/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 187 | Aces Total | 32 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 351 | Total Double Faults | 100 |
| 1:32:21 | Average Match Time | 1:23:8 |
| 384.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 331.1 |
| 64% (5788/9036) | 1st Serve % | 64% (2327/3638) |
| 57% (3315/5788) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (1334/2327) |
| 44% (1425/3248) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (598/1311) |
| 48% (522/1093) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (188/407) |
| 46% (4131/9079) | Return Points Win % | 44% (1522/3485) |
| 28.85% (15/37) | Challenger W/L | 46.88% (15/17) |
| 54.44% (49/41) | Futures W/L | 48.72% (19/20) |
| 45% (64/141) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (34/71) |
| 42% (10/24) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 40% (4/10) |
| 54% (21/39) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (10/21) |
| 88% (64/56) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (33/28) |
| 13% (64/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (33/5) |
| 10% (78/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (38/6) |